Surface Load Mitigation Measures - Best Practice
METHOD | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES |
---|---|---|
Reduce the operating pressure of the pipeline. | Provides a direct reduction of the hoop stress due to internal pressure. This reduction allows for additional circumferential stress due to equipment loads |
|
Limit surface pressures under vehicles (e.g., using floatation tires or caterpillar tracks) | Spreads the surface load over a larger area and reduces the overall load to the pipe. | Depends on equipment. May not be possible or too costly to implement |
Consider the beneficial effect of lateral soil restraint on circumferential stress | Has effect similar to pressure stiffening | Requires estimates of soil stiffness parameter, E’ |
Provide additional soil fill over the pipeline in the vicinity of the crossing | Reduces circumferential stresses due to traffic loads. | Increases circumferential stresses due to fill loads. |
Deploy steel plates over the crossing | Easy to install. | Flexibility of steel plates can result in bending of the plate with a corresponding reduction in loaded footprint. Need to consider required thickness. |
Deploy timber mats over the crossing area | Provides large loading footprint. Relatively easy to deploy. | Flexibility of timber mats can result in bending of the mats with a corresponding reduction in loaded footprint. |
Construct a concrete slab with steel reinforcement over the crossing area | Provides large loading footprint. Slab can provide high bending stiffness |
|
Construct a short bridge crossing over the pipeline | Completely uncouples the traffic loading from the buried pipeline. |
|
Relocate the pipeline | Removes pipeline from loaded area. |
|
Lower pipeline | Reduces circumferential stresses due to traffic loads. |
|